DRUG
Decriminalization:
A Trend Takes Shape
COLET TA A. YOUNGERS AND
JOHN M. WALSH
Latin American frustration with the “war on drugs” is grow- ing. Harsh anti-drug laws have
failed to stem apparently rising
drug use, and incarceration rates
are climbing—up 40 percent on average in Mexico and South America over the last decade—with more
drug users and low-level dealers behind bars. But high-level drug traffickers carry on with impunity.
Increasingly, many countries are
leaning toward decriminalization
as an alternative approach, hoping
that it will be effective both in reducing consumption and dealing
with associated health problems.
This approach treats drug abuse as
a public health and social policy issue rather than as a criminal justice
problem. The goal is to encourage
addicts to seek help, reduce prison
overcrowding and free law enforcement to focus on dismantling drug-trafficking organizations.
Decriminalization proposals often spark fears that drug use will
rise, but experts such as the University of Maryland’s Peter Reuter find
no evidence of this in the case of
personal marijuana consumption.
On August 25, the Argentine Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose criminal
sanctions for the personal possession of drugs. Although narrowly
written, the judgment paves the
way for legislation that would decriminalize the possession of illicit
drugs for personal consumption.
Just days before the Argentine
ruling, Mexico followed a similar path with a law decriminalizing possession of small quantities
of drugs and mandating increased
prevention and treatment programs. Those apprehended with
a minimal amount of drugs—for
example, 0.17 ounces ( 5 grams) of
marijuana or 0.02 ounces (500 milligrams) of cocaine—will be encouraged to seek treatment, which
becomes mandatory after the third
arrest. The rationale: allow law enforcement to instead target small-scale dealers and criminal networks. However, the new law sets
a low threshold in differentiating
between a consumer and a seller
and applies harsher penalties for
small-scale dealing. It may also
send more recreational drug users
to jail.
Uruguay, which never criminal-ized drug possession for personal
use, takes a more holistic approach.
Instead of a quantitative cut-off between what is considered consuming and dealing, judges—in accordance with a 1974 law—evaluate
the specific circumstances and assess why the individual possessed
the drugs. Some legal analysts
view this as arbitrary, but such discretion can prevent consumers
from ending up in jail.
In Brazil, legislative changes in
2002 and 2006 led to the partial
decriminalization of possession
for personal use, replacing prison
sentences with mandatory treatment and community service. Discussion is underway on further
reforms that would fully decriminalize consumption and ensure
proportionality of sentences for
convicted drug dealers.
AMERICASQUARTERLY.ORG
POLICY UPDATE