reducing the spatial privileges of class, and on a far
healthier relationship to the natural environment.
Until now, such planning has too often been the victim of the fragmented and dysfunctional politics of
our undisciplined, overweight cities.
Studies by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention suggest that a primary villain is
urban sprawl and its enabler, the automobile. Their
collusion is characterized by rampant suburbanism
and by low-density patterns of land use that make
mass transit both economically and logistically
impossible. And because we walk less, we are less
healthy. But this is not simply a function of urban
form. Obesity is disproportionately a disease of the
poor in the U.S.—a paradox that arises directly from
the dominance of an industrialized fast-food system
that offers the most degraded form of nutrition at low
prices, laced with corn sugar to seduce, and supersized to suggest value.
Michael Sorkin is the principal of the Michael
Sorkin Studio, president of the nonprofit Terre-form and Distinguished Professor of Architecture
and Director of the Graduate Program in Urban
Design at the City College of New York. His most
recent book is Twenty Minutes in Manhattan.
The growing unhealthiness of urban lifestyles is
a global problem. The world’s urban population is
growing at the rate of one million people a week and
half of this growth is concentrated in slums, where
the lack of access to transportation, goods and services, a proper diet and adequate living space has aggravated existing health problems—even as it ironically
gives slums a lower ecological footprint. These inequities within cities are often ignored in the debate
over carbon caps—with its clash bet ween exponents
of calculation by absolute emissions (where China
leads) and per capita emissions (where the U.S. is
champ). But an urban-oriented approach to environmental change must be aimed at achieving greater
parity at the individual level. This will mean a kind
of conceptual capping and trading in which hyper-consumers will ultimately be obliged, in effect, to
switch some of their “credits” to the poor, even as the
aggregate is driven down.
Such a convergence can only take place by redeveloping cities with a view to reducing their impact
on the environment, which means a global rethinking of what a good city should be. One of the most
popular initiatives enacted by President Barack
Obama’s administration has been the “cash for clunkers” program, offering incentives to car owners to
trade up from their old gas-guzzlers to more fuel-
PREVIOUS PAGE: ANDRE PENNER/AP; ABOVE: WILLIAM FERNANDO MARTINEZ/AP
54 Americas Quarterly FALL 2009