H. E. Leonel
Fernández is
serving his second
term as president
of the Dominican
Republic.
the $42 billion shortfall in our
energy bills. While that may
sound high, it still represents
only 3 percent of the profits
reported from recent oil price
increases.
The mechanism for recovering these profits would be
a “Global Petroleum Solidarity
Fund.” This fund could be established in the World Bank or
within regional development
banks, or based in other international institutions that are
already working on programs
aimed at helping developing
economies meet the challenges
of the global energy and food
crisis. The International Fund
for Agricultural Development
(IFAD), for instance, was established within the UN following
the first oil crisis of the 1970s
precisely to face the food crisis
that arose as a result. Whatever
institution became the repository of these windfall funds,
poorer nations would be allowed to withdraw a “refund”
proportional to their expenditures in crude oil imports.
I believe that such a mechanism would enable the countries hardest hit by the energy
crisis to invest in projects
aimed at stimulating food production. In doing so, we would
be close to resolving in a single step, and relatively quickly,
the worst set of crises we have
faced as a region.
MAURICIO DUENAS/AFP/GEtty IMAGES
By simultaneously mitigating the impact of increasing oil prices and investing in
food production, our region
could produce food at record
levels and at lower prices. By
taking the initiative, we might
have a chance of meeting the
ambitious goals of all of our
nations to reduce extreme poverty and hunger. But there is
little time to lose. Each day the
crisis cont.inues, the situation faced by the poorest countries worsens.
Endnotes
1 The $42 billion
that we have estimated represents
the difference
between the $130
dollars per barrel
in mid July 2008
and the $60 per
barrel, which was
the average price
about a year ago.